Jon Gabriel
  • Home
  • Words
  • Media
  • Design
  • Contact

ricochet: Stop the Euphemism Treadmill, I Want to Get Off

8/17/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The English language evolves quickly. New terms emerge and old ones die with remarkable speed, especially in our accelerated age. Changes in culture, technology, and entertainment are often the catalysts, but more and more, the pursuit of social justice is the cause.

The latter leads to what author Steven Pinker named the “euphemism treadmill.” One term is deemed offensive, so it is replaced with a new term, which, over time, is deemed offensive itself.

A good example of this comes from the field of mental health. Offended by hopelessly vague and unscientific terms like “crazy” and “madness,” early psychologists chose sterile, humane terms such as “moron,” “imbecile,” and “idiot.” But if you happened to visit a schoolyard any time after the Harding administration, you know it didn’t take long for kids to yell those well-meaning terms as they pantsed the kid with his tongue stuck to the flagpole.

To prevent hurt feelings, medical professionals dropped those words and coined “mental retardation,” which only sped up the euphemism treadmill. While some clinics still use that term, it has mostly been replaced by any number of euphemisms. “Mentally handicapped” was replaced with “mentally impaired” was replaced with “mentally challenged” was replaced with “developmentally disabled” until today, when several professionals have thrown up their hands and go with the hopelessly vague and unscientific term “behavioral wellness.” We’ve come a long way since “crazy.”

The treadmill only speeds up when you enter the modern Social Justice movement. If it were chartered today, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People would be taboo, but its definitional equivalent, the National Association for the Advancement of People of Color, would be applauded. NAACP bad; NAAPC good. Why, “PC” is right in the name!

But now even “PC” isn’t politically correct. The website Everyday Feminism published an article this week titled “4 Reasons ‘People of Color’ Isn’t Always the Best Choice of Words.”

Language is often one of the last forms of oppression to be challenged – because how do we tackle something so essential to how we communicate with the world and each other? But language is one of the most powerful ways to create change or uphold oppression for that very reason.

Diversity culture, or this push to challenge the societal norms that subconsciously support heteronormative whiteness at the cost of all others, could be responsible for how the term people of color can be used maliciously – albeit unintentionally…

Ironically, the trap of people of color can be permitted by the very people who identify as such – mainly by non-Black people of color, who in their efforts to raise awareness against oppression, continue to rely on exploitation and subconscious violence rooted in language.

Lately, language has pushed to better encompass the sensitivity and awareness needed to navigate within racial identity and ethnicity. But the term people of color – an umbrella term used to encompass everyone who identifies as someone from a non-white background – can be the easiest way for us to fall in the trap of “one size fits all” thinking.

And what’s worse, the term people of color can contribute to the violence that specific communities face every day in a white supremacist society.


Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words are violence too.

The author — one Cameron G., an “emerging sex educator and professional fangirl from New Jersey” — says that white folk should refer to groups of people by their specific ethnic identity. But getting specific has its downsides since the most recent US Census form has categories for Hispanic/Latino/Spanish origin; Black/African American/Negro; Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Other Asian; Native Hawaiian, Guamanian/Chamorro, Samoan, Other Pacific Islander; or “some other race.”

Replacing “POC” with “POHLSBAANAICFJKVOANHGCSOPISOR” is a touch unwieldy, even for Cameron G. As she closes her piece, she introduces a new term without even a cursory explanation of why it’s an improvement over the old.

We’re able to recognize that we have power in our unique identities, and be allies in supporting other communities of color against white supremacy and violence. However, we do more harm than good by lumping us all together under a forced umbrella of false equality.

Communities of color are powerful and worthy of being acknowledged specifically.


I look forward to Cameron G.’s 2017 thinkpiece, “4 Reasons ‘Communities of Color’ Isn’t Always the Best Choice of Words.”
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Arizona
    Arizona Republic
    Art
    Business
    Buzzfeed
    Communication
    Culture
    Daily Caller
    Design
    Drugs
    Economy
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Family
    Food & Drink
    Freedomworks
    Free Speech
    Gender
    Guns
    Health Care
    Heartland Institute
    Humor
    Immigration
    International
    Journalism
    Military
    Music
    Neatorama
    NY Post
    Outrage
    Philosophy
    Photoshop
    Politics
    Red Tape
    Religion
    Ricochet
    Social Media
    Technology
    Unions
    USA Today
    Wall Street Journal

    RSS Feed

© 2017  Jon Gabriel. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • Words
  • Media
  • Design
  • Contact